CETAF Strategy ISTC DWG: Difference between revisions
From CETAF ISTC Wiki
bwf>Anton Güntsch No edit summary |
bwf>Anton Güntsch |
||
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies == | == Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies == | ||
=== | === ACTIONS === | ||
{| | {| | ||
! style="text-align:left;"| Action | ! style="text-align:left;"| Action | ||
! Interpretation | ! style="text-align:left;"|Interpretation and notes | ||
! Planned activities | ! style="text-align:left;"|Existing activities | ||
! Products | ! style="text-align:left;"|Planned activities | ||
! style="text-align:left;"|Products | |||
|- | |||
| '''''Moving taxonomy into the digital world''''' | |||
|- | |||
| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies || There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? || Existing shared database infrastructures with strong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench || xx || JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench | |||
|- | |||
| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable || Relates to DiSSCo OpenDS and ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. || LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, OpenDS specification and implementation in DiSSCoPrepare, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) || xx || xx | |||
|- | |||
| iii. Increasing the use of collection data || ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows || Botany pilot, Wikidata activities (Mobilise) || xx || xx | |||
|- | |||
| '''''Ensuring retrievable, connected and interoperable biodiversity data''''' | |||
|- | |||
| i. Using commonly agreed ‘stable identifiers’ for the natural history collections || Clearly CETAF IDs || CETAF/ISTC ID initiative, activities in SYNTHESYS+ || ID Registry, standard (RDF) metadata || xx | |||
|- | |||
| ii. Implementing recognised collection metadata descriptions || Unclear, where this will be defined and implemented; relates to CETAF passports and other (TDWG) attempest to standardise collection descriptions || Global Collections Catalogue (workshop and consultation organised by GBIF)|| xx || xx | |||
|- | |||
| iii. Linking European, national and regional collections of specimens and data (checklists or databases) || Extend LOD-approach to "other" data types || SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, DiSSCo Prepare standards / common resources activities|| xx || xx | |||
|- | |||
| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies''''' | |||
|- | |||
| i. Continuing the development of compatible data standards || Much progress with regard to collection data (ABCD, DwC, etc.), more work needed for establishing agreed vocabularies and standards for "other" data types || SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, MOBILISE, DiSSCo Prepare Data Model || xx || ABCD; DwC; GGBN; MOD-CO | |||
|- | |||
| ii. Adopting and implementing guidelines on standards || Adoption of standards can be measured by the number of standards compliant service implementations (e.g. collection provider software, LOD services, etc.). "Implementing guidelines" does not really differ from iii. || SYNTHESYS+ ID/LOD activities || xx || xx | |||
|- | |||
| iii. Collating and distributing interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing || Should be a dynamic documentation (e.g. wiki page) linking to actively maintained standardisation efforts || SYNTHESYS+, MOBILISE || DiSSCo prepare || xx | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | iv. Establishing and promoting specimen data and database citation standards (source recognition) || Is this addressed in CETAF or one of the DiSSCo projects?, MOBILISE WG for data publication || xx || xx || xx | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | '''''Safeguarding long-term data storage, curation and longevity''''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | i. Organising the maintenance of a supported system for data storage || xx ||MOBILISE WG for data archiving || xx || xx | ||
|- | |||
| ii. Adopting processes for orphan databases or digital information || Not yet a CETAF activity. There is a national (German) system dealing with orphaned databases (https://rebind.bgbm.org/), which could be used as a basis for a European activity. There is also a CODATA Interest Group "data at risk" || xx || xx || xx | |||
|} | |} | ||
=== | === TARGETS === | ||
{| | {| | ||
! style="text-align:left;"| | ! style="text-align:left;"| Target | ||
! Interpretation | ! style="text-align:left;"| Interpretation & notes | ||
! | ! style="text-align:left;"| State | ||
|- | |||
| CETAF interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions || Probably already fulfilled if we count the number of CETAF institutions with working (GBIF) provider software installations. || yellow/green | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | CETAF standard identifiers are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions || The number can easily be monitored once the ID registry is functioning. Broadening the implementations is part of the SYNTHESYS+ project. || yellow | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Digital data curation guidelines are produced and adopted || Needs to be coordinated with DiSSCo || red/yellow | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Digital storage capacity infrastructure is established within the consortium || MOBILISE WG for data archiving || red/yellow | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== | == Focus Area #3 - Natural history collection management and access to collections == | ||
=== ACTIONS === | |||
{| | {| | ||
! style="text-align:left;"| Action | ! style="text-align:left;"| Action | ||
! Interpretation | ! style="text-align:left;"|Interpretation and notes | ||
! Planned activities | ! style="text-align:left;"|Existing activities | ||
! Products | ! style="text-align:left;"|Planned activities | ||
! style="text-align:left;"|Products | |||
|- | |||
| '''''Promoting the physical or digital accessibility to collections''''' | |||
|- | |||
| v. Collaborating with major initiatives on specimen data sharing, data annotation and data-flow || DiSSCo and related projects, as well as other national and international initiatives || DWG partners in all the DiSSCo-related projects and sharing information|| More collaboration with international initiatives and more sharing information about national initiatives|| xx | |||
|- | |||
| '''''Digitising and databasing collections''''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| i. | | i. Exploring methods and best practices in data storage and data curation || Need to clarify DWG and ISTC roles here || xx || xx || xx | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ii. | | ii. Supporting the development of digitisation policies, techniques and technology || Need to bring in SYNTHESYS3 work on the Management Plan on Digital Collections (MPDC)|| [https://synthesys3.biowikifarm.net/syn3/NA2/objective1/task1/cmp]|| xx || xx | ||
|- | |- | ||
| iii. | | iii. Exploring the development of storage and digitisation infrastructures || Need to clarify DWG and ISTC roles here|| DiSSCo related activities|| xx || xx | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== | === TARGETS === | ||
{| | {| | ||
! style="text-align:left;"| | ! style="text-align:left;"| Target | ||
! Interpretation | ! style="text-align:left;"| Interpretation & notes | ||
! | ! style="text-align:left;"| State | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | 10% of our 1.5 billion natural history collections are databased, digitised and digitally available and scientific collection visits increase by 10% || Collaborating on the development of MIDS and looking at GBIF|| xx | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | CETAF best practice and common collections policies are implemented in the majority of member institutions || xx || xx | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 09:31, 20 April 2020
CETAF Strategy & Strategic Development Plan 2015 - 2025
Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies
ACTIONS
Action | Interpretation and notes | Existing activities | Planned activities | Products |
---|---|---|---|---|
Moving taxonomy into the digital world | ||||
i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies | There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? | Existing shared database infrastructures with strong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench | xx | JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench |
ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable | Relates to DiSSCo OpenDS and ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. | LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, OpenDS specification and implementation in DiSSCoPrepare, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) | xx | xx |
iii. Increasing the use of collection data | ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows | Botany pilot, Wikidata activities (Mobilise) | xx | xx |
Ensuring retrievable, connected and interoperable biodiversity data | ||||
i. Using commonly agreed ‘stable identifiers’ for the natural history collections | Clearly CETAF IDs | CETAF/ISTC ID initiative, activities in SYNTHESYS+ | ID Registry, standard (RDF) metadata | xx |
ii. Implementing recognised collection metadata descriptions | Unclear, where this will be defined and implemented; relates to CETAF passports and other (TDWG) attempest to standardise collection descriptions | Global Collections Catalogue (workshop and consultation organised by GBIF) | xx | xx |
iii. Linking European, national and regional collections of specimens and data (checklists or databases) | Extend LOD-approach to "other" data types | SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, DiSSCo Prepare standards / common resources activities | xx | xx |
Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies | ||||
i. Continuing the development of compatible data standards | Much progress with regard to collection data (ABCD, DwC, etc.), more work needed for establishing agreed vocabularies and standards for "other" data types | SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, MOBILISE, DiSSCo Prepare Data Model | xx | ABCD; DwC; GGBN; MOD-CO |
ii. Adopting and implementing guidelines on standards | Adoption of standards can be measured by the number of standards compliant service implementations (e.g. collection provider software, LOD services, etc.). "Implementing guidelines" does not really differ from iii. | SYNTHESYS+ ID/LOD activities | xx | xx |
iii. Collating and distributing interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing | Should be a dynamic documentation (e.g. wiki page) linking to actively maintained standardisation efforts | SYNTHESYS+, MOBILISE | DiSSCo prepare | xx |
iv. Establishing and promoting specimen data and database citation standards (source recognition) | Is this addressed in CETAF or one of the DiSSCo projects?, MOBILISE WG for data publication | xx | xx | xx |
Safeguarding long-term data storage, curation and longevity | ||||
i. Organising the maintenance of a supported system for data storage | xx | MOBILISE WG for data archiving | xx | xx |
ii. Adopting processes for orphan databases or digital information | Not yet a CETAF activity. There is a national (German) system dealing with orphaned databases (https://rebind.bgbm.org/), which could be used as a basis for a European activity. There is also a CODATA Interest Group "data at risk" | xx | xx | xx |
TARGETS
Target | Interpretation & notes | State |
---|---|---|
CETAF interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions | Probably already fulfilled if we count the number of CETAF institutions with working (GBIF) provider software installations. | yellow/green |
CETAF standard identifiers are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions | The number can easily be monitored once the ID registry is functioning. Broadening the implementations is part of the SYNTHESYS+ project. | yellow |
Digital data curation guidelines are produced and adopted | Needs to be coordinated with DiSSCo | red/yellow |
Digital storage capacity infrastructure is established within the consortium | MOBILISE WG for data archiving | red/yellow |
Focus Area #3 - Natural history collection management and access to collections
ACTIONS
Action | Interpretation and notes | Existing activities | Planned activities | Products |
---|---|---|---|---|
Promoting the physical or digital accessibility to collections | ||||
v. Collaborating with major initiatives on specimen data sharing, data annotation and data-flow | DiSSCo and related projects, as well as other national and international initiatives | DWG partners in all the DiSSCo-related projects and sharing information | More collaboration with international initiatives and more sharing information about national initiatives | xx |
Digitising and databasing collections | ||||
i. Exploring methods and best practices in data storage and data curation | Need to clarify DWG and ISTC roles here | xx | xx | xx |
ii. Supporting the development of digitisation policies, techniques and technology | Need to bring in SYNTHESYS3 work on the Management Plan on Digital Collections (MPDC) | [1] | xx | xx |
iii. Exploring the development of storage and digitisation infrastructures | Need to clarify DWG and ISTC roles here | DiSSCo related activities | xx | xx |
TARGETS
Target | Interpretation & notes | State |
---|---|---|
10% of our 1.5 billion natural history collections are databased, digitised and digitally available and scientific collection visits increase by 10% | Collaborating on the development of MIDS and looking at GBIF | xx |
CETAF best practice and common collections policies are implemented in the majority of member institutions | xx | xx |