ISTC QoS Workshop Copenhagen 2018 - Revision history

D.Fichtmüller: links to local version of openmedia files

2025-03-05T13:07:34Z

links to local version of openmedia files

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 5 March 2025
Line 168:		Line 168:

	== Map ==		== Map ==
	[~~http://species-id.net/openmedia/~~File:ISTC_DWG_2018_Map.png ~~Download~~]		[[File:ISTC_DWG_2018_Map.png]]

	== Hotels ==		== Hotels ==

D.Fichtmüller: links to local version of BWF pages

2025-03-05T12:05:27Z

links to local version of BWF pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 5 March 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	= Scope =		= Scope =
	During the first day of the workshop, participants will present existing (and planned) implementations of stable specimen identifiers (see ~~http://cetafidentifiers.biowikifarm.net/wiki/Main_Page~~). We will discuss pragmatic actions to improve the stability of individual implementations and the consistency of the entire system. Conclusions will be part of a CETAF best practice documentation providing the guideline for future implementations.		During the first day of the workshop, participants will present existing (and planned) implementations of stable specimen identifiers (see [[CETAF Stable Identifier Guide]]). We will discuss pragmatic actions to improve the stability of individual implementations and the consistency of the entire system. Conclusions will be part of a CETAF best practice documentation providing the guideline for future implementations.

	On the second day, we will focus on the interoperability of Linked Open Specimen Data between collections as well as interoperability with external resources. Expected outcomes are 1) agreed measures for improving the semantic richness of collection data and 2) agreed joint projects demonstrating the potential of specimen LOD. There will also be the opportunity for external participants to discuss interoperability between infrastructures and the role of CETAF IDs.		On the second day, we will focus on the interoperability of Linked Open Specimen Data between collections as well as interoperability with external resources. Expected outcomes are 1) agreed measures for improving the semantic richness of collection data and 2) agreed joint projects demonstrating the potential of specimen LOD. There will also be the opportunity for external participants to discuss interoperability between infrastructures and the role of CETAF IDs.
Line 83:		Line 83:
	\| '''15:00''' \|\| Towards improved interoperability		\| '''15:00''' \|\| Towards improved interoperability
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| How can we agree and implement more consistent (RDF) element sets? (see ~~http://cetafidentifiers.biowikifarm.net/wiki/~~CSPP)		\| \|\| How can we agree and implement more consistent (RDF) element sets? (see [[CSPP]])
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Pragmatic approaches to semantic enrichment of collection data (e.g. at BG Meise and BGBM)		\| \|\| Pragmatic approaches to semantic enrichment of collection data (e.g. at BG Meise and BGBM)

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal */

2018-06-19T12:10:08Z

Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 19 June 2018
Line 66:		Line 66:
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| GBIF Switzerland		\| \|\| GBIF Switzerland
			\|-
			\| \|\| SGN
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''13:00''' \|\| Lunch break		\| '''13:00''' \|\| Lunch break

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Scope */

2018-06-19T08:00:57Z

Scope

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 19 June 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:

	= Scope =		= Scope =
	During the first day of the workshop, participants will present existing (and planned) implementations of stable specimen identifiers (see http://cetafidentifiers.biowikifarm.net/wiki/Main_Page). We will discuss pragmatic actions to improve the stability of individual implementations and the ~~conistency~~ of the entire system. Conclusions will be part of a CETAF best practice documentation providing the guideline for future implementations.		During the first day of the workshop, participants will present existing (and planned) implementations of stable specimen identifiers (see http://cetafidentifiers.biowikifarm.net/wiki/Main_Page). We will discuss pragmatic actions to improve the stability of individual implementations and the consistency of the entire system. Conclusions will be part of a CETAF best practice documentation providing the guideline for future implementations.

	On the second day, we will focus on the interoperability of Linked Open Specimen Data between collections as well as interoperability with external resources. Expected outcomes are 1) agreed measures for improving the semantic richness of collection data and 2) agreed joint projects demonstrating the potential of specimen LOD. There will also be the opportunity for external participants to discuss interoperability between infrastructures and the role of CETAF IDs.		On the second day, we will focus on the interoperability of Linked Open Specimen Data between collections as well as interoperability with external resources. Expected outcomes are 1) agreed measures for improving the semantic richness of collection data and 2) agreed joint projects demonstrating the potential of specimen LOD. There will also be the opportunity for external participants to discuss interoperability between infrastructures and the role of CETAF IDs.

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Day 2 (June 20, 9:00 - 16:00): open for external participants */

2018-06-19T05:18:24Z

Day 2 (June 20, 9:00 - 16:00): open for external participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 19 June 2018
Line 137:		Line 137:
	\| \|\| The "data museum" project (Simon Chagnoux)		\| \|\| The "data museum" project (Simon Chagnoux)
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| ~~MorphDbase~~ (Peter Grobe)		\| \|\| Semantic Morph∙D∙Base - Towards Linked Open Data for Morphology (Peter Grobe)
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Unified indexing of biodiversity data (Donald Hobern)		\| \|\| Unified indexing of biodiversity data (Donald Hobern)

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal */

2018-06-18T06:42:52Z

Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 18 June 2018
Line 98:		Line 98:
	'''19:00 Dinner'''		'''19:00 Dinner'''
	<br>RizRaz		<br>RizRaz
	<br>~~Store Kannikestræde 19~~		<br>Kompagnistræde 20
	<br>~~1169 København K~~		<br>1208 Copenhagen

	== Day 2 (June 20, 9:00 - 16:00): open for external participants ==		== Day 2 (June 20, 9:00 - 16:00): open for external participants ==

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Participants */

2018-06-14T12:41:23Z

Participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 14 June 2018
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* Dimitris Koureas (Naturalis) -only day 2		* Dimitris Koureas (Naturalis) -only day 2
	* Donald Hobern (GBIF) -only day 2		* Donald Hobern (GBIF) -only day 2
			* Ana Casino (CETAF) - only day 2

	= Draft agenda =		= Draft agenda =

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Day 2 (June 20, 9:00 - 16:00): open for external participants */

2018-06-12T08:16:37Z

Day 2 (June 20, 9:00 - 16:00): open for external participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 12 June 2018
Line 121:		Line 121:
	\| \|\| Required collections		\| \|\| Required collections
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Required external ~~ressources~~		\| \|\| Required external resources
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Required semantic enrichment activities		\| \|\| Required semantic enrichment activities

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal */

2018-06-12T08:16:16Z

Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 12 June 2018
Line 88:		Line 88:
	\| \|\| Potential external resources for semantic enrichment?		\| \|\| Potential external resources for semantic enrichment?
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Would it make sense to organise semantic enrichment with shared ~~ressources~~?		\| \|\| Would it make sense to organise semantic enrichment with shared resources?
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''16:00''' \|\| Questions / AOB		\| '''16:00''' \|\| Questions / AOB

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal */

2018-06-12T08:15:55Z

Day 1 (June 19, 10:00 - 17:00): (CETAF-) internal

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 12 June 2018
Line 86:		Line 86:
	\| \|\| Potential target elements for semantic enrichment?		\| \|\| Potential target elements for semantic enrichment?
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Potential external ~~ressources~~ for semantic enrichment?		\| \|\| Potential external resources for semantic enrichment?
	\|-		\|-
	\| \|\| Would it make sense to organise semantic enrichment with shared ressources?		\| \|\| Would it make sense to organise semantic enrichment with shared ressources?