CETAF Strategy ISTC DWG - Revision history

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies */

2020-04-20T07:31:32Z

Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 20 April 2020
Line 30:		Line 30:
	\| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies'''''		\| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| i. Continuing the development of compatible data standards \|\| Much progress with regard to collection data (ABCD, DwC, etc.), more work needed for establishing agreed vocabularies and standards for "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, MOBILISE \|\| DiSSCo Prepare Data Model \|\| ABCD; DwC; GGBN; MOD-CO		\| i. Continuing the development of compatible data standards \|\| Much progress with regard to collection data (ABCD, DwC, etc.), more work needed for establishing agreed vocabularies and standards for "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, MOBILISE, DiSSCo Prepare Data Model \|\| xx \|\| ABCD; DwC; GGBN; MOD-CO
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Adopting and implementing guidelines on standards \|\| Adoption of standards can be measured by the number of standards compliant service implementations (e.g. collection provider software, LOD services, etc.). "Implementing guidelines" does not really differ from iii. \|\| SYNTHESYS+ ID/LOD activities \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Adopting and implementing guidelines on standards \|\| Adoption of standards can be measured by the number of standards compliant service implementations (e.g. collection provider software, LOD services, etc.). "Implementing guidelines" does not really differ from iii. \|\| SYNTHESYS+ ID/LOD activities \|\| xx \|\| xx

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* ACTIONS */

2020-04-20T07:28:16Z

ACTIONS

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 20 April 2020
Line 26:		Line 26:
	\| ii. Implementing recognised collection metadata descriptions \|\| Unclear, where this will be defined and implemented; relates to CETAF passports and other (TDWG) attempest to standardise collection descriptions \|\| Global Collections Catalogue (workshop and consultation organised by GBIF)\|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Implementing recognised collection metadata descriptions \|\| Unclear, where this will be defined and implemented; relates to CETAF passports and other (TDWG) attempest to standardise collection descriptions \|\| Global Collections Catalogue (workshop and consultation organised by GBIF)\|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Linking European, national and regional collections of specimens and data (checklists or databases) \|\| Extend LOD-approach to "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iii. Linking European, national and regional collections of specimens and data (checklists or databases) \|\| Extend LOD-approach to "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, DiSSCo Prepare standards / common resources activities\|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies'''''		\| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies'''''

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* ACTIONS */

2020-04-20T07:25:50Z

ACTIONS

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 20 April 2020
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\| i. Using commonly agreed ‘stable identifiers’ for the natural history collections \|\| Clearly CETAF IDs \|\| CETAF/ISTC ID initiative, activities in SYNTHESYS+ \|\| ID Registry, standard (RDF) metadata \|\| xx		\| i. Using commonly agreed ‘stable identifiers’ for the natural history collections \|\| Clearly CETAF IDs \|\| CETAF/ISTC ID initiative, activities in SYNTHESYS+ \|\| ID Registry, standard (RDF) metadata \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Implementing recognised collection metadata descriptions \|\| Unclear, where this will be defined and implemented; relates to CETAF passports and other (TDWG) attempest to standardise collection descriptions \|\| xx\|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Implementing recognised collection metadata descriptions \|\| Unclear, where this will be defined and implemented; relates to CETAF passports and other (TDWG) attempest to standardise collection descriptions \|\| Global Collections Catalogue (workshop and consultation organised by GBIF)\|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Linking European, national and regional collections of specimens and data (checklists or databases) \|\| Extend LOD-approach to "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iii. Linking European, national and regional collections of specimens and data (checklists or databases) \|\| Extend LOD-approach to "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package \|\| xx \|\| xx

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* ACTIONS */

2020-04-20T07:21:07Z

ACTIONS

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:21, 20 April 2020
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to DiSSCo OpenDS and ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, OpenDS specification and implementation in DiSSCoPrepare, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to DiSSCo OpenDS and ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, OpenDS specification and implementation in DiSSCoPrepare, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Increasing the use of collection data \|\| ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows \|\| Botany pilot \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iii. Increasing the use of collection data \|\| ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows \|\| Botany pilot, Wikidata activities (Mobilise) \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''''Ensuring retrievable, connected and interoperable biodiversity data'''''		\| '''''Ensuring retrievable, connected and interoperable biodiversity data'''''

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies */

2020-04-20T07:17:46Z

Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 20 April 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies \|\| There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| Existing shared database infrastructures with strong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench \|\| xx \|\| JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench		\| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies \|\| There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| Existing shared database infrastructures with strong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench \|\| xx \|\| JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to DiSSCo OpenDS and ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, OpenDS specification and implementation in DiSSCoPrepare, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Increasing the use of collection data \|\| ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows \|\| Botany pilot \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iii. Increasing the use of collection data \|\| ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows \|\| Botany pilot \|\| xx \|\| xx

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies */

2020-04-20T07:15:09Z

Focus Area #4 - Biodiversity informatics and information technologies

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:15, 20 April 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\| '''''Moving taxonomy into the digital world'''''		\| '''''Moving taxonomy into the digital world'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies \|\| There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| Existing shared database infrastructures with ~~striong~~ CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench \|\| xx \|\| JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench		\| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies \|\| There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| Existing shared database infrastructures with strong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench \|\| xx \|\| JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx

bwf>Anton Güntsch: /* TARGETS */

2020-04-20T07:14:04Z

TARGETS

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 20 April 2020
Line 52:		Line 52:
	! style="text-align:left;"\| State		! style="text-align:left;"\| State
	\|-		\|-
	\| CETAF interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions \|\| Probably already fulfilled if we count the number of CETAF institutions with working (GBIF) provider software installations. \|\| xx		\| CETAF interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions \|\| Probably already fulfilled if we count the number of CETAF institutions with working (GBIF) provider software installations. \|\| yellow/green
	\|-		\|-
	\| CETAF standard identifiers are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions \|\| The number can easily be monitored once the ID registry is functioning. Broadening the implementations is part of the SYNTHESYS+ project. \|\| xx		\| CETAF standard identifiers are adopted in 80% of CETAF institutions \|\| The number can easily be monitored once the ID registry is functioning. Broadening the implementations is part of the SYNTHESYS+ project. \|\| yellow
	\|-		\|-
	\| Digital data curation guidelines are produced and adopted \|\| Needs to be coordinated with DiSSCo \|\| xx		\| Digital data curation guidelines are produced and adopted \|\| Needs to be coordinated with DiSSCo \|\| red/yellow
	\|-		\|-
	\| Digital storage capacity infrastructure is established within the consortium \|\| MOBILISE WG for data archiving \|\| xx		\| Digital storage capacity infrastructure is established within the consortium \|\| MOBILISE WG for data archiving \|\| red/yellow
	\|}		\|}

bwf>Elspeth Haston at 16:37, 13 May 2019

2019-05-13T16:37:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 13 May 2019
Line 74:		Line 74:
	\| '''''Promoting the physical or digital accessibility to collections'''''		\| '''''Promoting the physical or digital accessibility to collections'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| v. Collaborating with major initiatives on specimen data sharing, data annotation and data-flow \|\| DiSSCo and related projects, as well as other national and international initiatives \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| v. Collaborating with major initiatives on specimen data sharing, data annotation and data-flow \|\| DiSSCo and related projects, as well as other national and international initiatives \|\| DWG partners in all the DiSSCo-related projects and sharing information\|\| More collaboration with international initiatives and more sharing information about national initiatives\|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''''Digitising and databasing collections'''''		\| '''''Digitising and databasing collections'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| i. Exploring methods and best practices in data storage and data curation \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| i. Exploring methods and best practices in data storage and data curation \|\| Need to clarify DWG and ISTC roles here \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Supporting the development of digitisation policies, techniques and technology \|\| xx \|\| xx\|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Supporting the development of digitisation policies, techniques and technology \|\| Need to bring in SYNTHESYS3 work on the Management Plan on Digital Collections (MPDC)\|\| [https://synthesys3.biowikifarm.net/syn3/NA2/objective1/task1/cmp]\|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Exploring the development of storage and digitisation infrastructures \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iii. Exploring the development of storage and digitisation infrastructures \|\| Need to clarify DWG and ISTC roles here\|\| DiSSCo related activities\|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}
Line 93:		Line 93:
	! style="text-align:left;"\| State		! style="text-align:left;"\| State
	\|-		\|-
	\| 10% of our 1.5 billion natural history collections are databased, digitised and digitally available and scientific collection visits increase by 10% \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| 10% of our 1.5 billion natural history collections are databased, digitised and digitally available and scientific collection visits increase by 10% \|\| Collaborating on the development of MIDS and looking at GBIF\|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| CETAF best practice and common collections policies are implemented in the majority of member institutions \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| CETAF best practice and common collections policies are implemented in the majority of member institutions \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|}		\|}

bwf>Elspeth Haston: /* ACTIONS */

2019-05-13T16:16:54Z

ACTIONS

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 13 May 2019
Line 74:		Line 74:
	\| '''''Promoting the physical or digital accessibility to collections'''''		\| '''''Promoting the physical or digital accessibility to collections'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| v. Collaborating with major initiatives on specimen data sharing, data annotation and data-flow \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| v. Collaborating with major initiatives on specimen data sharing, data annotation and data-flow \|\| DiSSCo and related projects, as well as other national and international initiatives \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''''Digitising and databasing collections'''''		\| '''''Digitising and databasing collections'''''

bwf>Dagmar Triebel at 12:29, 15 February 2019

2019-02-15T12:29:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 15 February 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies \|\| There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| Existing shared database infrastructures with striong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench \|\| xx \|\| JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench		\| i. Supporting shared database infrastructure and open access policies \|\| There are no agreed CETAF open access policies. Is this adressed in one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| Existing shared database infrastructures with striong CETAF involvement are for example JACQ, DINA, and Diversity Workbench \|\| xx \|\| JACQ, DINA, Diversity Workbench
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and ~~Mobilise~~, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Making taxonomy data digitally interpretable and retrievable \|\| Relates to ISTC LOD activities as well as stable and standardised (web) services in general. \|\| LOD activities in SYNTHESYS+ and MOBILISE, Botany pilot LOD system; TDWG - BSC-IG (Biodiversity and Clients Interest Group) \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Increasing the use of collection data \|\| ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows \|\| Botany pilot \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iii. Increasing the use of collection data \|\| ISTC ID initiative works towards this goal, we need more streamlined services for integrating collection data in research workflows \|\| Botany pilot \|\| xx \|\| xx
Line 30:		Line 30:
	\| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies'''''		\| '''''Disseminating data and data processing standards, thesauri and controlled vocabularies'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| i. Continuing the development of compatible data standards \|\| Much progress with regard to collection data (ABCD, DwC, etc.), more work needed for establishing agreed vocabularies and standards for "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, ~~Mobilise~~ \|\| DiSSCo Prepare Data Model \|\| ABCD; DwC; GGBN		\| i. Continuing the development of compatible data standards \|\| Much progress with regard to collection data (ABCD, DwC, etc.), more work needed for establishing agreed vocabularies and standards for "other" data types \|\| SYNTHESYS+ standards work package, MOBILISE \|\| DiSSCo Prepare Data Model \|\| ABCD; DwC; GGBN; MOD-CO
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Adopting and implementing guidelines on standards \|\| Adoption of standards can be measured by the number of standards compliant service implementations (e.g. collection provider software, LOD services, etc.). "Implementing guidelines" does not really differ from iii. \|\| SYNTHESYS+ ID/LOD activities \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Adopting and implementing guidelines on standards \|\| Adoption of standards can be measured by the number of standards compliant service implementations (e.g. collection provider software, LOD services, etc.). "Implementing guidelines" does not really differ from iii. \|\| SYNTHESYS+ ID/LOD activities \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iii. Collating and distributing interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing \|\| Should be a dynamic documentation (e.g. wiki page) linking to actively maintained standardisation efforts \|\| SYNTHESYS+, ~~Mobilise~~ \|\| DiSSCo prepare \|\| xx		\| iii. Collating and distributing interoperable standards for biodiversity data and natural history specimen databasing \|\| Should be a dynamic documentation (e.g. wiki page) linking to actively maintained standardisation efforts \|\| SYNTHESYS+, MOBILISE \|\| DiSSCo prepare \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| iv. Establishing and promoting specimen data and database citation standards (source recognition) \|\| Is this addressed in CETAF or one of the DiSSCo projects? \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| iv. Establishing and promoting specimen data and database citation standards (source recognition) \|\| Is this addressed in CETAF or one of the DiSSCo projects?, MOBILISE WG for data publication \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''''Safeguarding long-term data storage, curation and longevity'''''		\| '''''Safeguarding long-term data storage, curation and longevity'''''
	\|-		\|-
	\| i. Organising the maintenance of a supported system for data storage \|\| xx \|\| ~~Mobilise~~ WG for data archiving \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| i. Organising the maintenance of a supported system for data storage \|\| xx \|\|MOBILISE WG for data archiving \|\| xx \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| ii. Adopting processes for orphan databases or digital information \|\| Not yet a CETAF activity. There is a national (German) system dealing with orphaned databases (https://rebind.bgbm.org/), which could be used as a basis for a European activity. There is also a CODATA Interest Group "data at risk" \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| ii. Adopting processes for orphan databases or digital information \|\| Not yet a CETAF activity. There is a national (German) system dealing with orphaned databases (https://rebind.bgbm.org/), which could be used as a basis for a European activity. There is also a CODATA Interest Group "data at risk" \|\| xx \|\| xx \|\| xx
Line 58:		Line 58:
	\| Digital data curation guidelines are produced and adopted \|\| Needs to be coordinated with DiSSCo \|\| xx		\| Digital data curation guidelines are produced and adopted \|\| Needs to be coordinated with DiSSCo \|\| xx
	\|-		\|-
	\| Digital storage capacity infrastructure is established within the consortium \|\| xx \|\| xx		\| Digital storage capacity infrastructure is established within the consortium \|\| MOBILISE WG for data archiving \|\| xx
	\|}		\|}